Tampering With the Evidence: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Policy-Making

Greg Marston, RMIT University
Rob Watts, RMIT University

ABSTRACT

Recent enthusiasm for evidence-based policy-making in Australia has many sources. So-called ‘managerialist’ reforms to public administration have been significant, as has the diffusion of particular bio-medical models of research. However, the meaning and practice of ‘evidence-based policy’ are contested. We offer an account of the design of arguments to identify and critically assess the value of evidence-based claims and their relationship to evidence-based policy. Our critique indicates the very wide range of what can — properly — count as evidence, based on a premise about the irreducible richness and complexity of social reality. We highlight the importance of being thoughtful about the assumptions that shape policy research questions and ‘warrant’ the conceptual connections that constitute knowledge claims. We illustrate our arguments with a policy research case study on juvenile crime.

Greg Marston is a Research Fellow in the Centre for Applied Social Research, School of Social Science and Planning, RMIT University. His research interests include welfare reform, the politics of policy-making and housing policy <greg.marston@rmit.edu.au>. Rob Watts is a Professor of Social Policy in the School of Social Science and Planning, RMIT University. His research interests are multi-disciplinary, located at the interstices between social theory, philosophy, history and policy studies <rob.watts@rmit.edu.au>.

Download in Adobe Acrobat (pdf) format, 255 Kb.